From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: buytenh@wantstofly.org ('Lennert Buytenhek')
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:10:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 40/54] ARM: Samsung SoCs: irq_data conversion.
In-Reply-To: <015801cb92e1$117861b0$34692510$%kim@samsung.com>
References: <cover.1291118519.git.buytenh@wantstofly.org>
	<20101130134112.GO15575@mail.wantstofly.org>
	<015801cb92e1$117861b0$34692510$%kim@samsung.com>
Message-ID: <20101214221055.GA16079@mail.wantstofly.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 08:56:03PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:

> Hi Lennert,

Hi again,


> (Added Mark Brown in Cc)
> 
> Looks ok to me but there are some comments.
> 
> Firstly, how about to separate this to regarding S3C24XX(mach-s3c24xx and
> plat-s3c24xx), S5P(mach-s5pxxxx and plat-s5p) and plat-samsung?
> (Actually, already applied S3C64XX changes so that we can drop that in your
> patch.)
> 
> As you know, I already applied some changes which is from Mark Brown in my
> tree.
> You can find that in
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
> #for-next
> 
> So could you please re-work this based on that?

I've reworked the patch I had in my tree on top of your git tree
(latest commit "Merge branch 'next-s5p64x0' into for-next"), and came
up with the three attached patches.  I've incorporated the whitespace
changes you requested, and changed the struct irq_data * variable
names from 'd' to 'data' to match Mark's earlier patches.

Caveat emptor -- uncompiled, and totally untested.

How's this look?

Feel free to merge this via your tree -- I'll drop the Samsung patch
from my tree then.


thanks,
Lennert