From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:41:48 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: mxs: Change duart device to use amba-pl011 In-Reply-To: <20101222021049.GI16497@freescale.com> References: <1292857064-5032-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@freescale.com> <1292937130-32155-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@freescale.com> <20101221203121.GB31617@pengutronix.de> <20101222021049.GI16497@freescale.com> Message-ID: <20101222114148.GB4368@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Shawn, On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:10:50AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > [...] > > > static struct clk_lookup lookups[] = { > > > - _REGISTER_CLOCK("mxs-duart.0", NULL, uart_clk) > > > + _REGISTER_CLOCK("uart", NULL, uart_clk) > > > > Maybe "duart"? > > > I was thinking about the naming "uart" vs "duart" here, and decided to > pick the "uart", because this is the name of clock "uart_clk", which > is the clock for uart domain, not only duart. Makes sense. Thanks, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: