From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM: Prototype the pm_generic_ operations Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:19:59 +0000 Message-ID: <20101222121958.GA13320__2783.12563100389$1293020433$gmane$org@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1292855593-30608-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <201012202208.59102.rjw@sisk.pl> <20101222114316.GA4520@sirena.org.uk> <201012221315.06948.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201012221315.06948.rjw@sisk.pl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Ben Dooks , Jean Delvare , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 01:15:06PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, December 22, 2010, Mark Brown wrote: > > Given the nearness of the merge window another option is to apply this > > one now and punt the I2C one until 2.6.38, I guess? > Except that I don't have any more fixes for 2.6.37 pending > and this one isn't really a fix. :-) Oh, sorry - I mean during the merge window rather than for 2.6.37.