From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755304Ab1ACOjr (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jan 2011 09:39:47 -0500 Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:47970 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754936Ab1ACOjq (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jan 2011 09:39:46 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; b=HjWrx4i6PmPUHY41yRNUChXmGhLirv2t95eXyW08LeCVPqQq+1CLPpmmoXkALmfvrA dDEjUZB2GM9x6cD3UbHxdMj6THwC36YxRK0+J3hET9eTeTTeqFnPxbJRG6d24J1yMS9J bzuvPL8D3PzM+Nr6BE96mPRo8BgCYQe9oMB5I= Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 17:39:26 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Torokhov , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Todd Fischer Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/32] input/tps6507x-ts: use system_wq instead of dedicated workqueue Message-ID: <20110103143926.GX1886@bicker> Mail-Followup-To: Dan Carpenter , Tejun Heo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Torokhov , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Todd Fischer References: <1294062595-30097-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1294062595-30097-11-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1294062595-30097-11-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:49:33PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: > With cmwq, there's no reason to use a separate workqueue. Drop > tps6507x_ts->wq and use system_wq instead. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > Cc: Dmitry Torokhov > Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Dan Carpenter > Cc: Todd Fischer > --- > Only compile tested. Please feel free to take it into the subsystem > tree or simply ack - I'll route it through the wq tree. > This is that driver that polls every 30 ms. :/ Todd, is there no way to avoid this? What was the status on that? regards, dan carpenter