From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45641 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pfsgj-00027k-FC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 06:28:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfsgD-0005fJ-DZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 06:27:58 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:35702) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfsgD-0005fA-44 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 06:27:53 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:27:48 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] usb redirection status report Message-ID: <20110120112748.GA5633@lst.de> References: <4D372A53.4070609@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D372A53.4070609@redhat.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Hans de Goede Cc: spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:15:47PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > As most of you know I'm working on usb redirection (making client usb > devices > accessible in guests over the network). > > I thought it would be a good idea to write a short status report. > > So fat the following has been done: > > * written and posted a network protocol for usb redir. over the network, > and send this to the list. How does this relate to the various existing usb over ip protocols, e.g. the one in drivers/staging/usbip/ in the Linux kernel tree?