From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753367Ab1AUSdI (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:33:08 -0500 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:55614 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751598Ab1AUSdH (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:33:07 -0500 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:33:04 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Marek Vasut Cc: Axel Lin , Eric Miao , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Haojian Zhuang Subject: Re: [PATCH] video: pxa168fb: remove a redundant pxa168fb_check_var call Message-ID: <20110121183304.GA3075@sirena.org.uk> References: <1295608686.3976.9.camel@phoenix> <201101211907.07386.marek.vasut@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201101211907.07386.marek.vasut@gmail.com> X-Cookie: I like your SNOOPY POSTER!! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 07:07:07PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > Please, don't use the get_maintainers script. This CCs too many people, really. *Using* get_maintainers.pl is fine, but it is important to apply taste to the results since as you say it does generate false positives. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:33:04 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] video: pxa168fb: remove a redundant pxa168fb_check_var call In-Reply-To: <201101211907.07386.marek.vasut@gmail.com> References: <1295608686.3976.9.camel@phoenix> <201101211907.07386.marek.vasut@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20110121183304.GA3075@sirena.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 07:07:07PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > Please, don't use the get_maintainers script. This CCs too many people, really. *Using* get_maintainers.pl is fine, but it is important to apply taste to the results since as you say it does generate false positives.