From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] ACPI: Fixes and cleanups related to iomaps management Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 20:12:13 +0100 Message-ID: <201101222012.14028.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <201101201226.41021.rjw@sisk.pl> <201101221025.49327.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:42390 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750724Ab1AVTNI (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Jan 2011 14:13:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Chua Cc: Len Brown , LKML , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux-pm mailing list , Matthew Garrett On Saturday, January 22, 2011, Jeff Chua wrote: > 2011/1/22 Rafael J. Wysocki : > > On Saturday, January 22, 2011, Jeff Chua wrote: > > > means that my patch [11/11] _and_ the replacement are totally wrong, because you have > > _multiple_ NVS regions. That really helped, thanks a lot. > > Would it be different if I offline all CPUs before suspending to ram? > It seems to help with suspending to disk. No, that doesn't matter. NVS regions are just sitting there regardless of what happens at run time. Thanks, Rafael