From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] ARM: bitops: switch set/clear/change bitops to use ldrex/strex Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:11:12 +0000 Message-ID: <20110124141112.GM16202@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20110117192050.GE23331@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110123001636.GA20841@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110123093526.GA26120@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110124102849.GA18459@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:46486 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751809Ab1AXOL2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:11:28 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Poddar, Sourav" Cc: Nicolas Pitre , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 07:17:54PM +0530, Poddar, Sourav wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:27:24PM +0530, Poddar, Sourav wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Poddar, Sourav wrote: > >> > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > >> > wrote: > >> >> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:44:59PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >> >>> At least another person did post results: > >> >>> > >> >>> http://mid.gmane.org/20110117094602.GA2622@pulham.picochip.com > >> >>> http://mid.gmane.org/20110117110308.GC2622@pulham.picochip.com > >> >> > >> >> Slightly different patch - there were three revisions. =A0I can= 't attach > >> >> a tested-by given to a different patch to this one. > >> >> > >> >>> > That means omap2plus_defconfig .38 mainline kernels > >> >>> > (including -stable) will remain potentially dangerous when r= un on > >> >>> > SMP capable hardware. > >> >>> > >> >>> I must admit that this series looks a bit large for stable IMH= O. =A0I > >> >>> think that the fix for stable should limit itself only to prev= ent SMP > >> >>> from being selected if anything else than CPU_32v6K is selecte= d. > >> >> > >> >> The first three are the bare minimum required for -stable. > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> =A0Boot tested the 14 patch series =A0with CONFIG_SWP_EMULATE enab= led, on > >> =A0the following boards : > >> > >> > >> =A0 1. Omap2420 SDP > >> > >> =A0 2. Omap2430 SDP > >> > >> =A0 3. Omap3430 SDP > >> > >> =A0 4. Omap4 Blaze > >> > >> =A0 Tested-by: Sourav Poddar > > > > Thanks. =A0It's also important to ascertain which filesystems were = tested - > > could you let me know please? > > >=20 > It is a custom filesystem on BusyBox v1.17.2. So you wrote code under fs/ for this filesystem? > Please let me know if you need some other > information. I'm trying to find out what _type_ of filesystem. ext2, ext3, nfs, cra= mfs, etc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:11:12 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 02/14] ARM: bitops: switch set/clear/change bitops to use ldrex/strex In-Reply-To: References: <20110117192050.GE23331@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110123001636.GA20841@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110123093526.GA26120@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110124102849.GA18459@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20110124141112.GM16202@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 07:17:54PM +0530, Poddar, Sourav wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:27:24PM +0530, Poddar, Sourav wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Poddar, Sourav wrote: > >> > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > >> > wrote: > >> >> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:44:59PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >> >>> At least another person did post results: > >> >>> > >> >>> http://mid.gmane.org/20110117094602.GA2622 at pulham.picochip.com > >> >>> http://mid.gmane.org/20110117110308.GC2622 at pulham.picochip.com > >> >> > >> >> Slightly different patch - there were three revisions. ?I can't attach > >> >> a tested-by given to a different patch to this one. > >> >> > >> >>> > That means omap2plus_defconfig .38 mainline kernels > >> >>> > (including -stable) will remain potentially dangerous when run on > >> >>> > SMP capable hardware. > >> >>> > >> >>> I must admit that this series looks a bit large for stable IMHO. ?I > >> >>> think that the fix for stable should limit itself only to prevent SMP > >> >>> from being selected if anything else than CPU_32v6K is selected. > >> >> > >> >> The first three are the bare minimum required for -stable. > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> ?Boot tested the 14 patch series ?with CONFIG_SWP_EMULATE enabled, on > >> ?the following boards : > >> > >> > >> ? 1. Omap2420 SDP > >> > >> ? 2. Omap2430 SDP > >> > >> ? 3. Omap3430 SDP > >> > >> ? 4. Omap4 Blaze > >> > >> ? Tested-by: Sourav Poddar > > > > Thanks. ?It's also important to ascertain which filesystems were tested - > > could you let me know please? > > > > It is a custom filesystem on BusyBox v1.17.2. So you wrote code under fs/ for this filesystem? > Please let me know if you need some other > information. I'm trying to find out what _type_ of filesystem. ext2, ext3, nfs, cramfs, etc.