From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hugo Mills <hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Bug in mkfs.btrfs?!
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:00:24 +0000
Message-ID: <20110124170023.GA7576@carfax.org.uk>
References: <20110122155612.GA3664@scooter>
 <20110123181827.GF29985@carfax.org.uk>
 <4D3CA568.7050506@libero.it>
 <20110124130104.GA7354@scooter>
 <20110124131341.GA3403@carfax.org.uk>
 <20110124135305.GB7354@scooter>
 <20110124142936.GB3403@carfax.org.uk>
 <20110124143448.GC3403@carfax.org.uk>
 <20110124144414.GD7354@scooter>
 <20110124165258.GA2562@scooter>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="liOOAslEiF7prFVr"
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
To: Felix Blanke <felixblanke@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110124165258.GA2562@scooter>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>


--liOOAslEiF7prFVr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 05:52:58PM +0100, Felix Blanke wrote:
> util-linux-2.18-r1 and still no symlink following.
> 
> I'll ask for that at the kernel mailing list in the next days. If your (Hugo)
> util-linux doesn't include any kind of patches that behaviour is really strange.

   Just for reference:

Package description page:
http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/util-linux

Original upstream sources Debian are using:
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux_2.17.2.orig.tar.gz

Debian patches on top of that source (mostly to the build system):
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/u/util-linux/util-linux_2.17.2-5.diff.gz

   Hugo.

> 
> Felix
> 
> On 24. January 2011 - 15:44, Felix Blanke wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:44:14 +0100
> > From: Felix Blanke <felixblanke@gmail.com>
> > To: Hugo Mills <hugo-lkml@carfax.org.uk>
> > Cc: kreijack@inwind.it, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: Bug in mkfs.btrfs?!
> > 
> > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:29:36PM +0000, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > > >    If, instead, the initial losetup call tracked the symlinks back to
> > > > the original device node (i.e. something like "/dev/sdb3", or
> > > > "/dev/mapper/ruthven-btest" in my example), then the name that's
> > > > stored in the kernel would be shorter, and we'd be less likely to see
> > > > the truncation. This is what my copy of losetup seems to be doing. I
> > > > can't see any distribution-specific patches in the source for
> > > > util-linux that would do this, though.
> > > 
> > >    Hmm... Just had a thought: is
> > > /dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSA2M160G2GC_CVPO939201JX160AGN-part3 on
> > > your system a symlink or a device node? What does ls -l say?
> > 
> > It is a symlink created by udev:
> > 
> > ls -l /dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSA2M160G2GC_CVPO939201JX160AGN-part3 
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Jan 23 23:39
> > /dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSA2M160G2GC_CVPO939201JX160AGN-part3 -> ../../sdb3
> > 
> > Following that link should work :)
> > 
> > 
> > Felix
> > 
> > > 
> > >    Hugo.
> > > 

-- 
=== Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
  PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
    --- Turning,  pages turning in the widening bath, / The spine ---    
        cannot bear the humidity. / Books fall apart; the binding        
            cannot hold. / Page 129 is loosed upon the world.            

--liOOAslEiF7prFVr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFNPbAnIKyzvlFcI40RAtPOAJ0dGMNB9I6Nbgy38Fmmvj3euWJ7DACdGWEi
HsVmIZCflMXjFLHHk87FLUM=
=icpF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--liOOAslEiF7prFVr--