From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751751Ab1AXUIA (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:08:00 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:38844 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751321Ab1AXUH7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:07:59 -0500 Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 21:07:38 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Weisbecker , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] perf fixes Message-ID: <20110124200738.GA10833@elte.hu> References: <20110124133400.GA1228@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > Please pull the latest perf-fixes-for-linus git tree from: > > > >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git perf-fixes-for-linus > > I'm not sure if this was true before too, but when I do > > perf report -agf sleep 10 (that's perf record i guess?) > > while compiling the kernel to get a system profile on x86-32, the > resulting pef.data file will cause "perf report" to just hang. > > Is it just me? We used to have such bugs recently so i'm quite sure what you see is real. The above test is almost the same what i did before sending you the pull request, so it's not occuring all the time and on all boxes. The distro version on that box you are using would be helpful, plus the build output you get when you build 'tools/perf'. (I.e. which libraries are there. If it comes up empty with no complaints you have all the devel libraries.) We'll try to reproduce it locally before asking more debug data from you, perf.data's can be pretty large to send via email :) Thanks, Ingo