From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/32] video/msm_fb: use system_wq instead of dedicated workqueues Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:45:58 +0100 Message-ID: <20110125134558.GY27510@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1294062595-30097-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1294062595-30097-21-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20110103170615.GB2285@redhat.com> <1294078245.18295.5.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1294078245.18295.5.camel-y5Owza0q8UhBVvN7MMdr1KRtKmQZhJ7pQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-usb-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Daniel Walker Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Stanislaw Gruszka , linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, David Brown , Bryan Huntsman , linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:10:45AM -0800, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 18:06 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:49:43PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > With cmwq, there's no reason to use separate workqueues. Drop > > > msmfb_info->resume_workqueue and use system_wq instead. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > > > Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka > > I'm not the right person, CC according to MAINTAINERS > > ARM/QUALCOMM MSM MACHINE SUPPORT > M: David Brown > M: Daniel Walker > M: Bryan Huntsman Oops, sorry about that. So how does the patch look? Are you gonna take it through msm tree or shall I take it? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753587Ab1AYNqG (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:46:06 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:38990 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753487Ab1AYNqD (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:46:03 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Gngne2102zbC9iS1G2sxdym+ZmNZ3eWBRmugIgHQkWAkEoSVwqGbOI2vcWYcP6ncuS FpAhfkk8AwyR1JjL2m0xpxTFMK8V+CeiJ8oZao5R0R0xXV2fo+VfcKcrqgq9ypVMml6v q7YFsYBIYyp1bS8jQKzg3xmvsg6yXVLE1e11s= Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:45:58 +0100 From: Tejun Heo To: Daniel Walker Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stanislaw Gruszka , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, David Brown , Bryan Huntsman , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/32] video/msm_fb: use system_wq instead of dedicated workqueues Message-ID: <20110125134558.GY27510@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1294062595-30097-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1294062595-30097-21-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20110103170615.GB2285@redhat.com> <1294078245.18295.5.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1294078245.18295.5.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:10:45AM -0800, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 18:06 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:49:43PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > With cmwq, there's no reason to use separate workqueues. Drop > > > msmfb_info->resume_workqueue and use system_wq instead. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > > > Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka > > I'm not the right person, CC according to MAINTAINERS > > ARM/QUALCOMM MSM MACHINE SUPPORT > M: David Brown > M: Daniel Walker > M: Bryan Huntsman Oops, sorry about that. So how does the patch look? Are you gonna take it through msm tree or shall I take it? Thanks. -- tejun