From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753870Ab1AYOTt (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:19:49 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:63522 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753742Ab1AYOTr (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:19:47 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=ok5E4d2FIgsjQPAwEhWleudNWr39gYEukuBF9Ej2Z0/Gq3vWurtmzqJCwov6WpSt8B PxwwCPWB8hla0DJEUHdRjKE9cBv+RHz5kIuXA1PEralRH+7wjQcBFPxIuNJZLM8S2Ejs IwVo3LHwHpsv6+32uecXSSSDVEyGbZUkPswKc= Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:19:42 +0100 From: Tejun Heo To: Todd Fischer Cc: Dan Carpenter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Torokhov , linux-input@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/32] input/tps6507x-ts: use system_wq instead of dedicated workqueue Message-ID: <20110125141942.GA27510@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1294062595-30097-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1294062595-30097-11-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20110103143926.GX1886@bicker> <4D21FAA3.8030505@ridgerun.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D21FAA3.8030505@ridgerun.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 09:34:43AM -0700, Todd Fischer wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Polling is only necessary because I was given brain dead hardware. > I was expecting updated hardware with the interrupt signal connected > properly, but haven't received it yet. > > Any reasonable hardware will not need tps6507x-ts polling. I was > under the impression I could only push patches that I have tested. > Since I haven't tested an interrupt version of the driver, I didn't > include a patch that removes the polling and replaces it with > interrupts. > > I have another customer planning on using the TPS6507x chip for > touch screen. I expect their hardware in around 3 weeks. Shall I apply the patch? Thanks. -- tejun