From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754037Ab1AYXe4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:34:56 -0500 Received: from mail.openrapids.net ([64.15.138.104]:39404 "EHLO blackscsi.openrapids.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752754Ab1AYXey (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:34:54 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:34:52 -0500 From: Mathieu Desnoyers To: Steven Rostedt Cc: David Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu, richm@oldelvet.org.uk, ben@decadent.org.uk, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, stable Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] introduce __u64_aligned and U64_ALIGN() for structure alignment in custom sections (v3) Message-ID: <20110125233451.GA29539@Krystal> References: <20110121203630.725922272@efficios.com> <20110121203642.725191236@efficios.com> <20110121.160503.233879710.davem@davemloft.net> <20110122171134.GA31308@Krystal> <1295718225.12215.4822.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1295718225.12215.4822.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> X-Editor: vi X-Info: http://www.efficios.com X-Operating-System: Linux/2.6.26-2-686 (i686) X-Uptime: 18:33:23 up 63 days, 4:36, 4 users, load average: 0.14, 0.04, 0.01 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Steven Rostedt (rostedt@goodmis.org) wrote: > On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 12:11 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > After these patches get merged -- I would recommend going through the tracing > > tree -- they'll have to go to -stable too. I'm therefore forwarding this to > > stable@kernel.org (the same should be done for the two other patches in this > > series). > > Hi Mathieu, > > I was in the process of putting them through my ktest.pl patch-check > tests, but unfortunately, another bug was triggered (unrelated to these) > and prevented me from getting them ready last night. > > I'll continue on them on Monday. Hi Steven, Any progress on the merge process for this bugfix patch series ? The issue seemed rather pressing last week, given that it breaks sparc64. Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Desnoyers Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:34:52 +0000 Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] introduce __u64_aligned and U64_ALIGN() for Message-Id: <20110125233451.GA29539@Krystal> List-Id: References: <20110121203630.725922272@efficios.com> <20110121203642.725191236@efficios.com> <20110121.160503.233879710.davem@davemloft.net> <20110122171134.GA31308@Krystal> <1295718225.12215.4822.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <1295718225.12215.4822.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Steven Rostedt Cc: David Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu, richm@oldelvet.org.uk, ben@decadent.org.uk, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, stable * Steven Rostedt (rostedt@goodmis.org) wrote: > On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 12:11 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > After these patches get merged -- I would recommend going through the tracing > > tree -- they'll have to go to -stable too. I'm therefore forwarding this to > > stable@kernel.org (the same should be done for the two other patches in this > > series). > > Hi Mathieu, > > I was in the process of putting them through my ktest.pl patch-check > tests, but unfortunately, another bug was triggered (unrelated to these) > and prevented me from getting them ready last night. > > I'll continue on them on Monday. Hi Steven, Any progress on the merge process for this bugfix patch series ? The issue seemed rather pressing last week, given that it breaks sparc64. Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com