From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>, linux-x25@vger.kernel.org, Takahiro Hirofuchi <hirofuchi@users.sourceforge.net>, Ross Cohen <rcohen@snurgle.org>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>, Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>, Stuart Swales <stuart.swales.croftnuisk@gmail.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>, autofs@linux.kernel.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Palash Bandyopadhyay <palash.bandyopadhyay@conexant.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.or Subject: Re: [RFC 00/20] Proposal for remaining BKL users Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:31:30 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <201101261231.30390.arnd@arndb.de> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20110126022223.GB28072@suse.de> On Wednesday 26 January 2011, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:17:14PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > I've gone through all the code in the kernel that > > uses the big kernel lock and come up with a solution > > that seems at least half-reasonable for each of them. > > > > The decisions are somewhat arbitrary, but here is > > what I'd suggest we do: > > > > * Remove in 2.6.39: > > i830, autofs3, smbfs > > I thought some people really wanted to keep i830. Or was that i810? > I'll drop autofs3 and smbfs, thanks. i810 needs to be kept, i830 is obsolete, see the patch changelogs there. I assume that Dave Airlie will take both patches (i810 BKL removal and i830 removal) into his 2.6.39 queue. > > * Work around in an ugly way, but keep alive: > > * ufs, ipx, i810, cx25721 > > > > * Fix properly: > > * usbip, go7007, adfs, x25 > > Thanks for the usbip and go7007 patches, I'll queue them up. It would be good if you could also take the cx25721 patch. It's not the nicest one I've done, but it's a bug fix nonetheless. Thanks, Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>, linux-x25@vger.kernel.org, Takahiro Hirofuchi <hirofuchi@users.sourceforge.net>, Ross Cohen <rcohen@snurgle.org>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>, Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>, Stuart Swales <stuart.swales.croftnuisk@gmail.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>, autofs@linux.kernel.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Palash Bandyopadhyay <palash.bandyopadhyay@conexant.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.or> Subject: Re: [RFC 00/20] Proposal for remaining BKL users Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:31:30 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <201101261231.30390.arnd@arndb.de> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20110126022223.GB28072@suse.de> On Wednesday 26 January 2011, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:17:14PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > I've gone through all the code in the kernel that > > uses the big kernel lock and come up with a solution > > that seems at least half-reasonable for each of them. > > > > The decisions are somewhat arbitrary, but here is > > what I'd suggest we do: > > > > * Remove in 2.6.39: > > i830, autofs3, smbfs > > I thought some people really wanted to keep i830. Or was that i810? > I'll drop autofs3 and smbfs, thanks. i810 needs to be kept, i830 is obsolete, see the patch changelogs there. I assume that Dave Airlie will take both patches (i810 BKL removal and i830 removal) into his 2.6.39 queue. > > * Work around in an ugly way, but keep alive: > > * ufs, ipx, i810, cx25721 > > > > * Fix properly: > > * usbip, go7007, adfs, x25 > > Thanks for the usbip and go7007 patches, I'll queue them up. It would be good if you could also take the cx25721 patch. It's not the nicest one I've done, but it's a bug fix nonetheless. Thanks, Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-26 11:31 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-01-25 22:17 [RFC 00/20] Proposal for remaining BKL users Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-25 22:17 ` Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-25 22:17 ` [PATCH 01/20] drm/i810: remove the BKL Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-25 22:17 ` [PATCH 02/20] drm: remove i830 driver Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-25 22:17 ` [PATCH 03/20] staging/usbip: convert to kthread Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-28 17:53 ` Max Vozeler 2011-01-28 18:48 ` Arnd Bergmann 2011-03-01 22:15 ` Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-25 22:17 ` [PATCH 04/20] staging/cx25721: serialize access to devlist Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-26 16:23 ` Palash Bandyopadhyay 2011-01-31 21:37 ` Greg KH 2011-01-25 22:17 ` [PATCH 05/20] staging/go7007: remove the BKL Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-25 22:17 ` [PATCH 06/20] staging: Remove autofs3 Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-26 7:41 ` H. Peter Anvin 2011-01-25 22:17 ` [PATCH 07/20] staging: remove smbfs Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-25 22:17 ` [PATCH 08/20] adfs: remove the big kernel lock Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-25 22:20 ` Russell King 2011-01-25 22:17 ` [PATCH 09/20] hpfs: rename big kernel lock to hpfs_lock Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-25 22:17 ` [PATCH 10/20] hpfs: replace BKL with a global mutex Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-26 0:15 ` Andi Kleen 2011-01-26 0:19 ` Andi Kleen 2011-01-26 12:48 ` [PATCH v2] hpfs: remove the BKL Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-26 12:50 ` [PATCH 10/20] hpfs: replace BKL with a global mutex Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-26 16:52 ` Andi Kleen 2011-01-27 5:01 ` Nick Piggin 2011-01-27 10:57 ` Miklos Szeredi 2011-01-25 22:17 ` [PATCH 11/20] hpfs: move to drivers/staging Arnd Bergmann 2011-02-07 16:17 ` Mikulas Patocka 2011-02-07 19:31 ` Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-25 22:17 ` [PATCH 12/20] x25: remove the BKL Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-27 10:07 ` Andrew Hendry 2011-01-27 12:17 ` Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-27 12:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-27 13:20 ` Eric Dumazet 2011-01-27 13:43 ` Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-25 22:17 ` [PATCH 13/20] appletalk: move to staging Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-25 22:17 ` [PATCH 14/20] staging/appletalk: remove the BKL Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-25 22:29 ` David Miller 2011-01-26 12:57 ` Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-25 22:17 ` [PATCH 15/20] ufs: " Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-26 2:30 ` Nick Bowler 2011-01-26 12:53 ` Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-27 5:47 ` Nick Piggin 2011-01-27 13:13 ` Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-25 22:17 ` [PATCH 16/20] ipx: " Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-25 22:17 ` [PATCH 17/20] tracing: don't trace " Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-25 22:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker 2011-01-25 22:17 ` [PATCH 18/20] rtmutex-tester: remove BKL tests Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-26 15:00 ` [tip:core/locking] rtmutex-tester: Remove " tip-bot for Arnd Bergmann 2011-02-22 20:57 ` [tip:irq/core] rtmutex: tester: " tip-bot for Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-25 22:17 ` [PATCH 19/20] drivers: remove extraneous includes of smp_lock.h Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-25 22:17 ` [PATCH 20/20] BKL: That's all, folks Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-26 6:19 ` Ingo Molnar 2011-01-26 8:47 ` Alan Cox 2011-01-26 11:01 ` Ingo Molnar 2011-01-26 11:22 ` Thomas Gleixner 2011-01-26 2:22 ` [RFC 00/20] Proposal for remaining BKL users Greg KH 2011-01-26 2:22 ` Greg KH 2011-01-26 11:31 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message] 2011-01-26 11:31 ` Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-26 11:58 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2011-01-26 13:45 ` Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-26 13:45 ` Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-26 16:24 ` Palash Bandyopadhyay 2011-01-25 22:22 Arnd Bergmann 2011-01-25 22:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=201101261231.30390.arnd@arndb.de \ --to=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.or \ --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \ --cc=autofs@linux.kernel.org \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=dushistov@mail.ru \ --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \ --cc=gregkh@suse.de \ --cc=hirofuchi@users.sourceforge.net \ --cc=hpa@zytor.com \ --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-x25@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mchehab@redhat.com \ --cc=mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \ --cc=nbowler@elliptictech.com \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=palash.bandyopadhyay@conexant.com \ --cc=raven@themaw.net \ --cc=rcohen@snurgle.org \ --cc=stuart.swales.croftnuisk@gmail.com \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.