From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753716Ab1AZTuW (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:50:22 -0500 Received: from mail-gx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]:46325 "EHLO mail-gx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751728Ab1AZTuU (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:50:20 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=r3j4E/E5FEmLz7e6h3Fp2kB09sp762fp3nlksiYAb+brDgMVQTV8juVrf5fcaqcYrY O2mhcU1UN9i9nndPH7w4mDt892J4V+sTrYDDBomOTxWfSnndjcu0tVBkMuRdW0eCG81C /GNw8aM5bmDt3aY/OiJiCambkTLAKc8KO3pKg= Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:50:12 -0800 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Mark Lord Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ? Message-ID: <20110126195011.GF29268@core.coreip.homeip.net> References: <20110125205453.GA19896@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4D3F4804.6070508@redhat.com> <4D3F4D11.9040302@teksavvy.com> <20110125232914.GA20130@core.coreip.homeip.net> <20110126020003.GA23085@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4D403855.4050706@teksavvy.com> <4D405A9D.4070607@redhat.com> <4D4076FD.6070207@teksavvy.com> <20110126194127.GE29268@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4D407A46.4080407@teksavvy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D407A46.4080407@teksavvy.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 02:47:18PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: > On 11-01-26 02:41 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > I do not consider lsinput refusing to work a regression. > > Obviously, since you don't use that tool. > Those of us who do use it see this as broken userspace compatibility. > > Who the hell reviews this crap, anyway? > Code like that should never have made it upstream in the first place. > You are more than welcome spend more time on reviews. Thanks. -- Dmitry