From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.ru>
Subject: Re: Performance question, RAID5
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 03:53:52 +0500
Message-ID: <20110130035352.1d72e8d1@natsu>
References: <AANLkTimXp-vGP8fb2Y-2EiaGxj+H6UJ9DfjtYMVDhDri@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
 boundary="Sig_/CjMac9=JyrGsr2eG/OgMIdw"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimXp-vGP8fb2Y-2EiaGxj+H6UJ9DfjtYMVDhDri@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Mathias =?UTF-8?B?QnVyw6lu?= <mathias.buren@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux-RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

--Sig_/CjMac9=JyrGsr2eG/OgMIdw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 22:48:06 +0000
Mathias Bur=C3=A9n <mathias.buren@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>=20
> I'm wondering if the performance I'm getting is OK or if there's
> something I can do about it. Also, where the potential bottlenecks
> are.

How are your disks plugged in? Which controller model(s), which bus.
But generally, on an Atom 1.6 Ghz those seem like good results.

--=20
With respect,
Roman

--Sig_/CjMac9=JyrGsr2eG/OgMIdw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk1EmoAACgkQTLKSvz+PZwjvVwCfV/jNStK0hV/yxhzoBo5i1ABT
7AsAn10vw1uyLM+6u1LWuiUyIMH5eFuu
=in+R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/CjMac9=JyrGsr2eG/OgMIdw--