From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Nadav Har'El" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/29] nVMX: Nested VMX, v8 Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:07:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20110131100704.GC23022@fermat.math.technion.ac.il> References: <1296116987-nyh@il.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, gleb@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com To: Juerg Haefliger Return-path: Received: from mailgw12.technion.ac.il ([132.68.225.12]:17197 "EHLO mailgw12.technion.ac.il" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751422Ab1AaKHI (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 05:07:08 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jan 28, 2011, Juerg Haefliger wrote about "Re: [PATCH 0/29] nVMX: Nested VMX, v8": > This branch doesn't even compile: >... > CC [M] drivers/staging/smbfs/dir.o > drivers/staging/smbfs/dir.c:286: error: static declaration of I tried to compile this branch with the default .config (answering the defaults to every question in "make config"), and it compiled without any error. However, the default configuration is *not* to compile the code you had problems in, drivers/staging/smbfs, because by default CONFIG_STAGING is off. When I went to enable CONFIG_STAGING and then SMB_FS, I was given a big warning that smbfs is "OBSOLETE, please use CIFS". Is there a specific reason why you want to use smbfs, not cifs? Anyway, when I did enable SMB_FS, and compiled, sure enought I got the same error that you did. This definitely has nothing to do with the nested VMX patches. If smbfs isn't essential to you, please try again without it (turn off SMB_FS in your .config). If it is, maybe you should report this problem to the smbfs maintainers? Thanks, Nadav. -- Nadav Har'El | Monday, Jan 31 2011, 26 Shevat 5771 nyh@math.technion.ac.il |----------------------------------------- Phone +972-523-790466, ICQ 13349191 |This box was intentionally left blank. http://nadav.harel.org.il |