From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] perf tools: Initial python binding
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:37:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110131103746.GA32639@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110130134429.GF13616@ghostprotocols.net>
* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org> wrote:
> Em Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 08:19:19PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> >
> > First clarifying that this kind of binding is not a replacement or an
> > equivalent to the 'perf script' way of using python with perf.
> >
> > The 'perf script' way is to process events and look at a given script
> > for some python function that matches the events to pass each event for
> > processing.
>
> Ooops, forgot to add this to this cset, fixed it up and force pushed it
> there.
>
> - Arnaldo
Pulled, thanks a lot Arnaldo!
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-31 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-29 22:19 [GIT PULL 0/7] perf/core improvements Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-01-29 22:19 ` [PATCH 1/7] perf record: No need to check for overwrites Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-01-29 22:19 ` [PATCH 2/7] perf events: Account PERF_RECORD_LOST events in event__process Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-01-29 22:19 ` [PATCH 3/7] perf evlist: Support non overwrite mode in perf_evlist__read_on_cpu Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-01-29 22:19 ` [PATCH 4/7] perf top: Switch to non overwrite mode Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-01-29 22:19 ` [PATCH 5/7] perf tools: Rename 'struct sample_data' to 'struct perf_sample' Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-01-29 22:19 ` [PATCH 6/7] perf tools: Kill event_t typedef, use 'union perf_event' instead Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-01-29 22:19 ` [PATCH 7/7] perf tools: Initial python binding Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-01-30 0:39 ` Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2011-01-30 13:44 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-01-31 10:37 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110131103746.GA32639@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.