From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754081Ab1BBMMQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:12:16 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:42311 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754001Ab1BBMMP (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:12:15 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:11:47 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Ohad Ben-Cohen Cc: Andrew Morton , Greg KH , Tony Lindgren , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Benoit Cousson , Grant Likely , Suman Anna , Kevin Hilman , Arnd Bergmann , Paul Walmsley , Hari Kanigeri , Simon Que Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] drivers: hwspinlock: add framework Message-ID: <20110202121147.GA24993@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1296470024-26854-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <1296470024-26854-2-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <20110131153831.dca62146.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110131223859.27169db0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110131234028.8744b5fd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:12:38AM +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:36:22 +0200 Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> >> I'll do a quick respin of the patches with that and the > >> >> hwspinlock_internal.h comment above. > >> > > >> > OK.. > >> > > >> > The patch series looks OK to me. > >> > >> Can I add your Acked-by on the non-omap parts when I respin the series ? > > > > spose so.  I don't normally do acked-by's.  I think it's my way of > > avoiding getting blamed when it all blows up. > > I don't want to be breaking old habits then :) > > >> > Maybe Tony or Russell or Greg can grab them > >> > if they like the look of it all? > > Let's just wait a bit for Tony's or Russell's or Greg's answer. As it touches OMAP code, it makes sense to merge it through Tony's tree as that should reduce the number of possible conflicts. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] drivers: hwspinlock: add framework Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:11:47 +0000 Message-ID: <20110202121147.GA24993@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1296470024-26854-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <1296470024-26854-2-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <20110131153831.dca62146.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110131223859.27169db0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110131234028.8744b5fd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:42310 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754001Ab1BBMMM (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:12:12 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Ohad Ben-Cohen Cc: Andrew Morton , Greg KH , Tony Lindgren , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Benoit Cousson , Grant Likely , Suman Anna , Kevin Hilman , Arnd Bergmann , Paul Walmsley , Hari Kanigeri , Simon Que On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:12:38AM +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:36:22 +0200 Ohad Ben-Cohen = wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> >> I'll do a quick respin of the patches with that and the > >> >> hwspinlock_internal.h comment above. > >> > > >> > OK.. > >> > > >> > The patch series looks OK to me. > >> > >> Can I add your Acked-by on the non-omap parts when I respin the se= ries ? > > > > spose so. =A0I don't normally do acked-by's. =A0I think it's my way= of > > avoiding getting blamed when it all blows up. >=20 > I don't want to be breaking old habits then :) >=20 > >> > Maybe Tony or Russell or Greg can grab them > >> > if they like the look of it all? >=20 > Let's just wait a bit for Tony's or Russell's or Greg's answer. As it touches OMAP code, it makes sense to merge it through Tony's tree as that should reduce the number of possible conflicts. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:11:47 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v4 1/4] drivers: hwspinlock: add framework In-Reply-To: References: <1296470024-26854-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <1296470024-26854-2-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <20110131153831.dca62146.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110131223859.27169db0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110131234028.8744b5fd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: <20110202121147.GA24993@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:12:38AM +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:36:22 +0200 Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> >> I'll do a quick respin of the patches with that and the > >> >> hwspinlock_internal.h comment above. > >> > > >> > OK.. > >> > > >> > The patch series looks OK to me. > >> > >> Can I add your Acked-by on the non-omap parts when I respin the series ? > > > > spose so. ?I don't normally do acked-by's. ?I think it's my way of > > avoiding getting blamed when it all blows up. > > I don't want to be breaking old habits then :) > > >> > Maybe Tony or Russell or Greg can grab them > >> > if they like the look of it all? > > Let's just wait a bit for Tony's or Russell's or Greg's answer. As it touches OMAP code, it makes sense to merge it through Tony's tree as that should reduce the number of possible conflicts.