All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>,
	tytso@mit.edu, djwong@us.ibm.com, shli@kernel.org, neilb@suse.de,
	adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kmannth@us.ibm.com, cmm@us.ibm.com,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, rwheeler@redhat.com, hch@lst.de,
	josef@redhat.com, jmoyer@redhat.com, vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] block: skip elevator data initialization for flush requests
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:48:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110203144800.GA21160@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110203092823.GB2570@htj.dyndns.org>

Set REQ_SORTED, in the @rw_flags passed to the request allocator, for
all requests that may be put on IO scheduler.  REQ_SORTED is not set for
flush requests because they are never put on the IO scheduler.

Skip elevator data initialization during request allocation if
REQ_SORTED is not set in @rw_flags passed to get_request().

Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-core.c |   33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

v4: fixed bug where REQ_SORTED wasn't cleared on entry to get_request
    - and Jens, yes I agree this is still a hack

Index: linux-2.6/block/blk-core.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/block/blk-core.c
+++ linux-2.6/block/blk-core.c
@@ -754,6 +754,9 @@ static void freed_request(struct request
 
 /*
  * Get a free request, queue_lock must be held.
+ * @rw_flags: may be overloaded to convey additional request features;
+ * any overloaded feature flags must be cleared immediately.
+ *
  * Returns NULL on failure, with queue_lock held.
  * Returns !NULL on success, with queue_lock *not held*.
  */
@@ -764,7 +767,11 @@ static struct request *get_request(struc
 	struct request_list *rl = &q->rq;
 	struct io_context *ioc = NULL;
 	const bool is_sync = rw_is_sync(rw_flags) != 0;
-	int may_queue, priv;
+	const bool init_elv_data = !!(rw_flags & REQ_SORTED);
+	int may_queue, priv = 0;
+
+	if (init_elv_data)
+		rw_flags &= ~REQ_SORTED;
 
 	may_queue = elv_may_queue(q, rw_flags);
 	if (may_queue == ELV_MQUEUE_NO)
@@ -808,9 +815,14 @@ static struct request *get_request(struc
 	rl->count[is_sync]++;
 	rl->starved[is_sync] = 0;
 
-	priv = !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_ELVSWITCH, &q->queue_flags);
-	if (priv)
-		rl->elvpriv++;
+	/*
+	 * Only initialize elevator data if IO scheduler may be used.
+	 */
+	if (init_elv_data) {
+		priv = !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_ELVSWITCH, &q->queue_flags);
+		if (priv)
+			rl->elvpriv++;
+	}
 
 	if (blk_queue_io_stat(q))
 		rw_flags |= REQ_IO_STAT;
@@ -1197,6 +1209,7 @@ static int __make_request(struct request
 	const unsigned short prio = bio_prio(bio);
 	const bool sync = !!(bio->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC);
 	const bool unplug = !!(bio->bi_rw & REQ_UNPLUG);
+	const bool flush = !!(bio->bi_rw & (REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA));
 	const unsigned long ff = bio->bi_rw & REQ_FAILFAST_MASK;
 	int where = ELEVATOR_INSERT_SORT;
 	int rw_flags;
@@ -1210,7 +1223,7 @@ static int __make_request(struct request
 
 	spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
 
-	if (bio->bi_rw & (REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA)) {
+	if (flush) {
 		where = ELEVATOR_INSERT_FLUSH;
 		goto get_rq;
 	}
@@ -1293,6 +1306,16 @@ get_rq:
 		rw_flags |= REQ_SYNC;
 
 	/*
+	 * Set REQ_SORTED for all requests that may be put on IO scheduler.
+	 * The request allocator's IO scheduler initialization will be skipped
+	 * if REQ_SORTED is not set -- elv_set_request() is avoided so that
+	 * that the allocated request's elevator_private pointers are not
+	 * initialized and that space can be used by flush request data.
+	 */
+	if (!flush)
+		rw_flags |= REQ_SORTED;
+
+	/*
 	 * Grab a free request. This is might sleep but can not fail.
 	 * Returns with the queue unlocked.
 	 */

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-03 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-21 15:59 [PATCHSET] block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA to support merge Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: add REQ_FLUSH_SEQ Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59   ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: improve flush bio completion Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59   ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA to support merge Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 18:56   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-21 19:19     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-23 10:25     ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-23 10:29       ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-24 20:31       ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-25 10:21         ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 11:39           ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-23 23:37             ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-25 22:56           ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-01-22  0:49   ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-23 10:31     ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 20:46       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-01-25 21:04         ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-23 10:48   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-01-23 10:48     ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 20:41   ` [KNOWN BUGGY RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests Mike Snitzer
2011-01-25 20:41     ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-25 21:55     ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-26  5:27       ` [RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests -- was never BUGGY relative to upstream Mike Snitzer
2011-01-26 10:03     ` [KNOWN BUGGY RFC PATCH 4/3] block: skip elevator initialization for flush requests Tejun Heo
2011-01-26 10:05       ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-01 17:38       ` [RFC " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-01 18:52         ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-01 22:46           ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 21:51             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-02 22:06               ` Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 22:55             ` [PATCH v3 1/2] block: skip elevator data " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03  9:28               ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-03 14:48                 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2011-02-03 13:24               ` Jens Axboe
2011-02-03 13:38                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-04 15:04                   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-04 15:08                     ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-04 16:58                     ` [PATCH v5 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-03 14:54                 ` [PATCH v3 " Mike Snitzer
2011-02-01 22:46           ` [PATCH v2 2/2] block: share request flush fields with elevator_private Mike Snitzer
2011-02-01 22:46             ` Mike Snitzer
2011-02-02 21:52             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-03  9:24             ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-11 10:08             ` Jens Axboe
2011-01-21 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: reimplement FLUSH/FUA to support merge Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110203144800.GA21160@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=josef@redhat.com \
    --cc=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.