From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751498Ab1BDLEC (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Feb 2011 06:04:02 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:44306 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751035Ab1BDLEB (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Feb 2011 06:04:01 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=YBo2ZMDkUCjKxUaoQRAJO6MQRbHKd4g8jW4SLT7Ys8fVnPOKZi2gg9RRr0i1ZZzvNG zeOIpvEvxzAwboadOau13Fn7ByhCnNnbfCNhDvt6G0QRIcguhmC74MvYLfGZdWoo7UXI jEI4/Qg3p0I/VA9qEZO7pFaU92dJEHa+1OPiM= Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 12:03:32 +0100 From: Tejun Heo To: Ben Skeggs Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 08/32] drm/nouveau: use system_wq instead of dev_priv->wq Message-ID: <20110204110332.GC12133@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1294062595-30097-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1294062595-30097-9-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1294189627.2276.0.camel@nisroch> <1294190172.2276.2.camel@nisroch> <20110106172922.GA29580@mtj.dyndns.org> <20110126164918.GQ12520@htj.dyndns.org> <20110201104135.GI14211@htj.dyndns.org> <1296784411.7970.1.camel@nisroch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1296784411.7970.1.camel@nisroch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 11:53:25AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > Thanks for this again. I've just made some changes to the nv50 display > bottom half handling that these will conflict with, they'll hit the > nouveau tree next week. Eh, so it doesn't apply again? :-) > I'll push the still-relevant bits of your nouveau patch through the > nouveau tree for the 2.6.39-rc1 merge window. That ok? Yeah, sure, but if you tell me against which tree I should generate patch, I can also just redo the patch. Thanks. -- tejun