From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konstantin Khomoutov Subject: Re: [idea] separate .git dir and the working tree Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 13:49:53 +0300 Message-ID: <20110206104952.GD20056@localhost.localdomain> References: <20110205032339.GA15303@mg1> <20110205132708.GA18391@elie> <20110206002009.GA13594@mg1> <20110206004013.GB13594@mg1> <1296954015.4048.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Mike Gant , git@vger.kernel.org, redstun , Jonathan Nieder To: Jared Hance X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Feb 06 11:50:25 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pm2CF-0002Dl-UK for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Feb 2011 11:50:24 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752185Ab1BFKuG (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Feb 2011 05:50:06 -0500 Received: from mailhub.007spb.ru ([84.204.203.130]:56488 "EHLO mailhub.007spb.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752300Ab1BFKuE (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Feb 2011 05:50:04 -0500 Received: from proxysrv.domain007.com ([10.8.0.42]) by mailhub.007spb.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p16AnrUC002984; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 13:49:55 +0300 Received: by proxysrv.domain007.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6092BB22EF5; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 13:49:53 +0300 (MSK) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1296954015.4048.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Antivirus: Dr.Web (R) for Mail Servers on proxysrv host X-Antivirus-Code: 100000 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 08:00:15PM -0500, Jared Hance wrote: > > > My apologies, but I didn't see a cc list in the original. Please > > > explain. > > Never mind, I think I understand. > > So does anyone use Mutt? And do they know a recipe to move the sender > > address to the cc list? If not, I'll figure it out. > When I used Mutt, if I remember correctly, L did the job (list reply). Also "g" is "group reply" -- it simply replies to all e-mails mentioned in the mail which is being replied to.