From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39298 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PmYG4-0008AC-2O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 16:04:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PmXwX-0008Rb-BE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:44:18 -0500 Received: from hall.aurel32.net ([88.191.126.93]:35463) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PmXwX-0008RL-6a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:44:17 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 21:44:07 +0100 From: Aurelien Jarno Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/7] Enable I/O thread and VNC threads by default Message-ID: <20110207204407.GA16429@hall.aurel32.net> References: <1295902845-29807-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <1295902845-29807-3-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <4D3DFD20.8060004@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110125091741.GB30239@edde.se.axis.com> <20110125133453.GC5427@amt.cnet> <20110207101255.GA20413@amt.cnet> <20110207160350.GA26332@amt.cnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110207160350.GA26332@amt.cnet> Sender: Aurelien Jarno List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: Anthony Liguori , Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori , Paulo Bonzini , Paul Brook , Arun Bharadwaj , "Edgar E. Iglesias" On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 02:03:50PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 08:12:55AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > One more thing I didn't mention on the email-thread or on IRC is > > > > that last time I checked, qemu with io-thread was performing > > > > significantly slower than non io-thread builds. That was with > > > > TCG emulation (not kvm). Somewhere between 5 - 10% slower, IIRC. > > > > Can you recall what was the test ? > > It's also something I've seen using network transfer in guest. IIRC the biggest slowdown was using the smc91c111 card under qemu-system-arm where it was about 20% slower. Other cards on other architectures (I remember testing powerpc, mips and sh4) are more in the 5 to 10 % area. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net