From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?=) Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:29:15 +0100 Subject: Machine ID question In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20110210082915.GV27982@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 02:23:07PM -0700, John Linn wrote: > I used the form to create a new machine ID for the new Xilinx platform > in anticipation of > the code making it into the mainline sometime in the future. > > The proposed patches are using ARCH_XILINX in the Kconfig. You should use MACH_XILINX in the patches. There are some ARCH_... in the machine db, but I think nowadays you cannot (and should not) create them there. > > Below is the line that it created when I clicked on this link: > http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/download.php > > xilinx MACH_XILINX XILINX > 3343 > > Did I hose it up as the form wasn't completely clear to me (if I needed > to enter ARCH_XILINX)? > > Thanks, > John > > > > This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the > named recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be hmm, I'm at least not named explicitly, still I think the intention of your mail was to get an answer. IMHO it's not very sensible to add this footer on postings to public mailing lists. > proprietary, privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you > are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this > email message or any attachments. Delete this email message and any > attachments immediately. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |