From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.atheros.com ([12.19.149.2]:14039 "EHLO mail.atheros.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753647Ab1BNNqR (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 08:46:17 -0500 Received: from mail.atheros.com ([10.10.20.108]) by sidewinder.atheros.com for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 05:45:56 -0800 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:15:53 +0530 From: Rajkumar Manoharan To: Johannes Berg CC: Rajkumar Manoharan , "linville@tuxdriver.com" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mac80211: add monitor interface into PS disable list Message-ID: <20110214134553.GA31074@vmraj-lnx.users.atheros.com> References: <1297253799-9688-1-git-send-email-rmanoharan@atheros.com> <1297685187.3785.30.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <1297685187.3785.30.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:36:27PM +0530, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 17:46 +0530, Rajkumar Manoharan wrote: > > PS should be disabled in the presence of monitor interface. > > I'm not really sure -- should it? You can have monitors with no flags to > do see what you're receiving locally, so I prefer the current behaviour. I just confued with multi-vif behaviour where we are disabling PS. > If you really want to monitor everything you pretty much need to > disconnect anyway, I think? Fine. -- Rajkumar