From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com (Alexander Stein) Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:12:16 +0100 Subject: Machine ID question In-Reply-To: <20110210082915.GV27982@pengutronix.de> References: <20110210082915.GV27982@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <201102141612.17340.alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 10 February 2011, 09:29:15 Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 02:23:07PM -0700, John Linn wrote: > > I used the form to create a new machine ID for the new Xilinx platform > > in anticipation of > > the code making it into the mainline sometime in the future. > > > > The proposed patches are using ARCH_XILINX in the Kconfig. > > You should use MACH_XILINX in the patches. There are some ARCH_... in > the machine db, but I think nowadays you cannot (and should not) create > them there. Uhm, the last entry in the db was created today (14th Feb). Is there a reason why there no new entries should be created? Alexander