From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42950 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PzAgd-00046M-Fi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:32:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PzAgb-0005bD-RE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:32:03 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:18879) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PzAgb-0005b6-GU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:32:01 -0400 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2EGW0Gd001979 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:32:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:31:33 +0200 From: Alon Levy Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/7] introduce libcacard/vscard_common.h Message-ID: <20110314163133.GJ31372@playa.tlv.redhat.com> References: <1298460024-23591-1-git-send-email-alevy@redhat.com> <1298460024-23591-3-git-send-email-alevy@redhat.com> <4D7E1FAF.8020605@redhat.com> <20110314145253.GG31372@playa.tlv.redhat.com> <4D7E393D.3030408@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D7E393D.3030408@redhat.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jes Sorensen Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 04:50:21PM +0100, Jes Sorensen wrote: > On 03/14/11 15:52, Alon Levy wrote: > >> [snip] > >>> > > +/* VSCMsgInit Client <-> Host > >>> > > + * Client sends it on connection, with its own capabilities. > >>> > > + * Host replies with VSCMsgInit filling in its capabilities. > >>> > > + * > >>> > > + * It is not meant to be used for negotiation, i.e. sending more then > >>> > > + * once from any side, but could be used for that in the future. > >>> > > + * */ > >> > > >> > Looks like some automatic mangling of comments - happens in more than > >> > one place. > > What, the repeated "capabilities" word at the end of two consecutive lines? > > that's on purpose. > > Nope the > * > * > * > * */ > oh, that I actually left on purpose (well, not really caring that much). > looks odd. > > Jes