From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932482Ab1DMP6I (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:58:08 -0400 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:54594 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932312Ab1DMP4C (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:56:02 -0400 X-Mailbox-Line: From gregkh@clark.kroah.org Wed Apr 13 08:51:50 2011 Message-Id: <20110413155149.987951824@clark.kroah.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.48-16.4 Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:51:29 -0700 From: Greg KH To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Cc: stable-review@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Yongqiang Yang , "Theodore Tso" Subject: [65/74] ext4: fix credits computing for indirect mapped files In-Reply-To: <20110413155406.GA22568@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. ------------------ From: Yongqiang Yang commit 5b41395fcc0265fc9f193aef9df39ce49d64677c upstream. When writing a contiguous set of blocks, two indirect blocks could be needed depending on how the blocks are aligned, so we need to increase the number of credits needed by one. [ Also fixed a another bug which could further underestimate the number of journal credits needed by 1; the code was using integer division instead of DIV_ROUND_UP() -- tytso] Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Yang Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/ext4/inode.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -5458,13 +5458,12 @@ static int ext4_indirect_trans_blocks(st /* if nrblocks are contiguous */ if (chunk) { /* - * With N contiguous data blocks, it need at most - * N/EXT4_ADDR_PER_BLOCK(inode->i_sb) indirect blocks - * 2 dindirect blocks - * 1 tindirect block + * With N contiguous data blocks, we need at most + * N/EXT4_ADDR_PER_BLOCK(inode->i_sb) + 1 indirect blocks, + * 2 dindirect blocks, and 1 tindirect block */ - indirects = nrblocks / EXT4_ADDR_PER_BLOCK(inode->i_sb); - return indirects + 3; + return DIV_ROUND_UP(nrblocks, + EXT4_ADDR_PER_BLOCK(inode->i_sb)) + 4; } /* * if nrblocks are not contiguous, worse case, each block touch