From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754457Ab1DOWpe (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:45:34 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:36285 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752330Ab1DOWpc (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:45:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:44:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20110415.154457.28809247.davem@davemloft.net> To: sahne@0x90.at Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ipv6: ignore looped-back NA while dad is running From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20110414070925.GA78446@0x90.at> References: <20110414070925.GA78446@0x90.at> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Daniel Walter Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:09:25 +0200 > [ipv6] Ignore looped-back NAs while in Duplicate Address Detection > > If we send an unsolicited NA shortly after bringing up an > IPv6 address, the duplicate address detection algorithm > fails and the ip stays in tentative mode forever. > This is due a missing check if the NA is looped-back to us. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Walter Applied to net-next-2.6