From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 00:36:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110502043642.GD11804@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110502142454.a7091ad5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:24:54PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Mon, 2 May 2011 13:45:24 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 1 May 2011 22:24:18 -0400 Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Which version of the patch got merged ? This should be guarded by cc-option checks.
> >
> > It looks right to me (that's why I wrote "though I don't see why") but
> > empirically we have a problem.
>
> I do not get it for every compile fo a file, just a few times during a
> whole kernel build. Some config/arches do not produce any (like sparc32
> defconfig).
That's interesting. That suggests that something isn't being built with KBUILD_CFLAGS.
I did a full defconfig build on x86-64 successfully (allmodconfig is churning away).
Can you point me at something that doesn't build ?
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-02 4:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-02 2:18 linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-02 2:24 ` Dave Jones
2011-05-02 3:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-02 4:02 ` Dave Jones
2011-05-02 4:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-02 4:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-02 4:36 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2011-05-02 5:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-02 4:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-02 11:13 ` Michal Marek
2011-05-02 12:13 ` [PATCH] kbuild: Fix passing -Wno-* options to gcc 4.4+ Michal Marek
2011-05-03 0:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-03 8:52 ` Michal Marek
2011-05-02 15:17 ` linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-02 15:31 ` Michal Marek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-10-03 23:13 Stephen Rothwell
2023-08-28 4:57 Stephen Rothwell
2023-08-28 17:28 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-08-19 23:28 Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-23 0:25 ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-12-20 22:10 Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-09 9:30 Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-09 13:01 ` Dominique Martinet
2020-12-09 20:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-10 6:47 ` Dominique Martinet
2020-12-14 20:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-10 22:52 Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-11 0:22 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-12-11 16:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-11-30 23:06 Stephen Rothwell
2016-12-01 2:00 ` Nicholas Piggin
2010-12-23 0:00 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-30 0:52 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-30 20:24 ` Michal Marek
2010-09-30 0:50 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-30 20:25 ` Michal Marek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110502043642.GD11804@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.