All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Keld Jørn Simonsen" <keld@keldix.com>
To: Roberto Spadim <roberto@spadim.com.br>
Cc: "Keld Jørn Simonsen" <keld@keldix.com>,
	"Miles Fidelman" <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: wish for Linux MD mirrored raid types
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 20:29:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110506182939.GA23860@www2.open-std.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik8A0szuNk2HvDqQXpY3tSAdPoUKA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 12:34:36PM -0300, Roberto Spadim wrote:
> hum, i asked this question one time, the point is:
> raid1 code is very easy
> raid10 code is more complex
> 
> easy = faster, less memory, less cpu
> complex = faster?, more memory? more cpu?


I think more complex -> more intelligent, more features.

I think it is actually amazing what raid10 can do.
Is raid 1 in other systems really limited to say 2 disks
- mirrored? Then linux raid10 is much more intelligent. 
> 
> check others raid system (freebsd, netbsd) and check how they do...

Yes, and also HW raid. If Linux made raid10,far the default for RAID1,
then I think Linux would compare very well with other operating systems
and HW raid.

Best regards
keld

----

> 2011/5/6 Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@keldix.com>:
> > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 10:01:48AM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> >> Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
> >> >>As you say, RAID10,near on four disks is pretty much identical to
> >> >>RAID1+0 - i.e., a stripe of two normal RAID1 pairs.
> >> >>
> >>
> >> I don't that's exactly right.  At least as I understand it:
> >>
> >> - RAID1+0 (and RAID0+1) nests things - you start with two sets of RAID1
> >> mirrors, then stripe across them (or vice versa) - it's a nested set of
> >> steps
> >>
> >> - md RAID10 provides both mirroring and striping, but it's a more
> >> integrated function - (from the man page) "RAID10 provides a combination
> >> of RAID1 and RAID0, and sometimes known as RAID1+0. Every datablock is
> >> duplicated some number of times, and the resulting collection of
> >> datablocks are distributed over multiple drives." - but there isn't an
> >> inherent nesting in the process (i.e., no two disks are copies of each
> >> other, and md RAID10 will work over odd numbers of drives)
> >
> > Yes, you are right, RAID1+0 is nested, while Linux MD raid10 is not.
> > But the data layout of Linux MD RAID1+0 and Linux MD
> > RAID10,near is almost identical.
> >
> > keld
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Roberto Spadim
> Spadim Technology / SPAEmpresarial
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-06 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-06  7:17 wish for Linux MD mirrored raid types Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-06  7:31 ` Roman Mamedov
2011-05-06  9:03   ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-06  9:22     ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-05-06  9:41       ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-06  9:50         ` Roman Mamedov
2011-05-06 10:05           ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-05-06 10:54             ` David Brown
2011-05-06 13:27               ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-06 14:01                 ` Miles Fidelman
2011-05-06 15:24                   ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-06 15:34                     ` Roberto Spadim
2011-05-06 16:23                       ` Miles Fidelman
2011-05-06 18:29                       ` Keld Jørn Simonsen [this message]
2011-05-06 20:30                 ` Leslie Rhorer
2011-05-06 20:43                   ` Miles Fidelman
2011-05-06 12:33           ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-06 13:26             ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2011-05-06 13:40               ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-06  7:51 ` David Brown
2011-05-06  9:27   ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-08 18:14 ` Luca Berra
2011-05-08 21:25   ` Miles Fidelman
2011-05-09  3:40     ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-09  4:24       ` NeilBrown
2011-05-09 19:57         ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-09  5:22 ` Emmanuel Noobadmin
2011-05-09 14:48   ` Roberto Spadim
2011-05-09 19:59   ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2011-05-09 20:12     ` Roberto Spadim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110506182939.GA23860@www2.open-std.org \
    --to=keld@keldix.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfidelman@meetinghouse.net \
    --cc=roberto@spadim.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.