From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:54829) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJlbG-0005js-9s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 07:59:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJlbF-0003YV-Dy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 07:59:38 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.124]:49583) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJlbF-0003YO-CA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 07:59:37 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 06:59:35 -0500 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" Message-ID: <20110510115935.GA3541@mail.hallyn.com> References: <20110506173224.278066589@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110510040712.GA5823@mail.hallyn.com> <4DC91795.1040903@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DC91795.1040903@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 00/10] Qemu Trusted Platform Module (TPM) integration List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Berger Cc: andreas.niederl@iaik.tugraz.at, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Serge E. Hallyn" Quoting Stefan Berger (stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com): > On 05/10/2011 12:07 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > >To get this to compile on top of qemu-kvm, I needed the following > >patch to force CONFIG_THREAD on so as to define things like > >qemu_mutex_lock: > > > >Index: qemu-kvm-tpm/configure > >=================================================================== > >--- qemu-kvm-tpm.orig/configure 2011-05-09 21:19:10.920002303 -0500 > >+++ qemu-kvm-tpm/configure 2011-05-09 21:19:22.150002305 -0500 > >@@ -3420,6 +3420,7 @@ > > exit 1 > > fi > > echo "CONFIG_TPM=y">> $config_host_mak > >+ echo "CONFIG_THREAD=y">> $config_host_mak > > fi > > fi > > > That seems to be qemu-kvm specific. Hm, yeah, I guess it is. Wonder what the odds are of that actually working then. Well, I've just about got this and libtpms packaged, will hopefully finish up this afternoon and see. I saw nothing problematic in the patches, but just didn't feel qualified to send acks based on simple review, so figured I'd be better off actually testing. What is your plan regarding libtpms? Will you be making actual releases at sf.net at some point? thanks, -serge