From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ted Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ext4: fix possible use-after-free ext4_remove_li_request() Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 13:42:41 -0400 Message-ID: <20110520174241.GC29282@thunk.org> References: <1304956630-20384-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> <1304956630-20384-4-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> <4DD57827.9060104@redhat.com> <20110520160313.GA29282@thunk.org> <20110520173946.GB29282@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Eric Sandeen , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Lukas Czerner Return-path: Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:58019 "EHLO test.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751771Ab1ETRmt (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2011 13:42:49 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110520173946.GB29282@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 01:39:46PM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 06:16:34PM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote: > > > > I already did send it as a separate patch series with the version > > description. > > What, you mean the -v2 patch series? > > > So let me rephrase the question: Is -v2 your final answer? Ah, never mind. I got confused when with the other patch series where half the patches where -v3, and the other half were -v2. It makes what shows up in patchwork hard to follow. In the future, please bump the version number on the entire series, not just on individual patches, as it makes it a lot easier for me to track what is going on.... - Ted