From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jordi Pujol <jordipujolp@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: overlayfs patches for ovl_copy_up & ovl_rename
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 07:10:30 +0200
Message-ID: <201105210710.30519.jordipujolp@gmail.com>
References: <201105041659.38427.jordipujolp@gmail.com> <87zkmjxeg4.fsf@tucsk.pomaz.szeredi.hu> <201105191124.19859.jordipujolp@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:53628 "EHLO
	mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750698Ab1EUFKe (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 21 May 2011 01:10:34 -0400
Received: by wya21 with SMTP id 21so3133437wya.19
        for <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>; Fri, 20 May 2011 22:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201105191124.19859.jordipujolp@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

A Dijous 19 Maig 2011 11:24:19, Jordi Pujol va escriure:
> processes and maybe the cause of the problem is move from another
> filesystem to overlayfs.

observing a bit more about this, this is not a synchronization problem because 
in this case the file has not been copied to overlayfs, 
maybe there is some condition that does not permit the copy of that file.

Thanks,

Jordi Pujol

Live never ending Tale
GNU/Linux Live forever!
http://livenet.selfip.com