All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mfd wm8350: allocate irq descs dynamically
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 16:41:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110523144126.GF20715@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110523104409.GA15635@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

> 
> > -	if (!pdata || !pdata->irq_base) {
> > -		dev_warn(wm8350->dev, "No interrupt support, no IRQ base\n");
> > +	if (!pdata) {
> > +		dev_warn(wm8350->dev, "No interrupt support, no platform data\n");
> 
> This isn't terribly good, the only reason we're checking pdata here is
> because we can't dereference it to look up irq_base if it's not there.

I'm not sure what you mean here. Are you suggesting that we should
default to dynamically requested irqs without platform data?
I did it this way because without platform data pdata->irq_high is
unknown.

> 
> > +	if (!pdata->irq_base) {
> > +		wm8350->irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(-1, 0, ARRAY_SIZE(wm8350_irqs), 0);
> > +		if (wm8350->irq_base < 0) {
> 
> One other thing - it doesn't seem to be 100% desirable to making the
> allocation of the IRQ descriptors depend on not specifying a base - for
> many situations we're likely to want to know what the numbers we end up
> with are (eg, for passing to another device) but if we don't call
> irq_alloc_decs() the platform still has to arrange for the descriptors
> to be there in advance.  It feels like the code should always use
> irq_alloc_descs(), though obviously that's not going to work right now.

If that's the case the platform still can provide irq_base and then it
does know in advance. Also, shouldn't this other device be instantiated
from the wm8350 driver?

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-23 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-20  7:59 i.MX: switch to sparse irqs Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20  7:59 ` [PATCH 1/9] ARM i.MX tzic: do not depend on MXC_INTERNAL_IRQS Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20  7:59 ` [PATCH] mfd wm8350: allocate irq descs dynamically Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20 12:52   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-20 13:07     ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20 13:19       ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-21 11:29         ` Mark Brown
2011-05-23  6:25           ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-23 10:44             ` Mark Brown
2011-05-23 14:41               ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2011-05-23 15:22                 ` Mark Brown
2011-05-23 16:46                   ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-23 22:41                     ` Mark Brown
2011-05-24  7:28                       ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-24  9:46                         ` Mark Brown
2011-05-24 11:52                           ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-24 15:35                             ` Mark Brown
2011-05-25  8:13                               ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-25  9:23                                 ` Mark Brown
2011-05-25 19:10                                   ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20  7:59 ` [PATCH 2/9] ARM i.MX avic: do not depend on MXC_INTERNAL_IRQS Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20  7:59 ` [PATCH 3/9] ARM i.MX: get rid of wrong MXC_INTERNAL_IRQ usage Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20  7:59 ` [PATCH 4/9] mfd wm8350: allocate irq descs dynamically Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20  7:59 ` [PATCH 5/9] ARM i.MX mx31ads: allocate irqs for expio dynamically Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20  7:59 ` [PATCH 6/9] ARM i.MX 3ds debugboard: allocate irqs dynamically Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20  7:59 ` [PATCH 7/9] ARM i.MX: use sparse irqs Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20  7:59 ` [PATCH 8/9] dma IPU: rework irq handling Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20 13:16   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-20 13:30     ` Sascha Hauer
2011-05-20 16:46       ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-20 22:11         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-20  7:59 ` [PATCH 9/9] ARM i.MX3: remove now useless ipu platform data from boards Sascha Hauer
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-06-02 11:45 [PATCH] mfd wm8350: allocate irq descs dynamically Sascha Hauer
2011-06-02 11:53 ` Mark Brown
2011-06-02 13:37   ` Mark Brown
2011-06-02 15:47     ` Mark Brown
2011-05-19 18:56 Sascha Hauer
2011-05-19 21:04 ` Mark Brown
2011-05-19 22:04 ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110523144126.GF20715@pengutronix.de \
    --to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.