From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753098Ab1EXOz5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2011 10:55:57 -0400 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([38.113.113.100]:35803 "EHLO mail.codesourcery.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752341Ab1EXOz4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2011 10:55:56 -0400 From: Pedro Alves Organization: CodeSourcery To: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] ptrace: implement PTRACE_SEIZE Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 15:55:46 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35-28-generic; KDE/4.6.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Denys Vlasenko , oleg@redhat.com, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, indan@nul.nu, bdonlan@gmail.com References: <1305569849-10448-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <201105241336.04298.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20110524140215.GF10334@htj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20110524140215.GF10334@htj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201105241555.47282.pedro@codesourcery.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 24 May 2011 15:02:15, Tejun Heo wrote: > Now that thinking more about it, TRAP_STOP (INTERRUPT trap) would > probably be better. I'll think more about it. For fork, it doesn't > really matter but deliverying SIGSTOP on CLONE isn't too good. From > user's POV, TRAP_STOP should work too, right? AFAICS, it should be no problem. Thanks, -- Pedro Alves