All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Camille Moncelier <camille@moncelier.fr>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 3.0-rc1
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 15:38:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110530153826.456c63f8@rasalhague> (raw)
In-Reply-To: BANLkTinE8eSSovGx6CPPkTeCpqv8AsS2nw@mail.gmail.com

On Sun, 29 May 2011 18:30:32 -0700
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> I decided to just bite the bullet, and call the next version 3.0. It
> will get released close enough to the 20-year mark, which is excuse
> enough for me, although honestly, the real reason is just that I can
> no longe rcomfortably count as high as 40.

So, this is a <odd>.x.y release right ? According to you the schedule
was:

> - 2.6.<odd>: still a stable kernel, but accept bigger changes leading
>   up to it (timeframe: a month or two).
> - 2.<odd>.x: aim for big changes that may destabilize the kernel for 
>   several releases (timeframe: a year or two)
> - <odd>.x.x: Linus went crazy, broke absolutely _everything_, and
>   rewrote the kernel to be a microkernel using a special
>   message-passing version of Visual Basic. (timeframe: "we expect that
>   he will be released from the mental institution in a decade or
>   two").

Then the big question is where's that microkernel stuff you promised ?
Does the travel you are planning next week has anything to do with the
mental institution ?




  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-30 13:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-30  1:30 Linux 3.0-rc1 Linus Torvalds
2011-05-30  1:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-30  2:29   ` Américo Wang
2011-05-30  6:38   ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-05-30 20:03   ` Mariusz Kozlowski
2011-05-30 22:48     ` david
2011-05-31  5:40       ` Mariusz Kozlowski
2011-05-31  7:25         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-05-30  1:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-30 15:07   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-05-30  2:04 ` Greg KH
2011-05-30  6:39   ` Tarkan Erimer
2011-05-30  9:46   ` Miles Bader
2011-05-30 10:09     ` Anca Emanuel
2011-05-30 10:37       ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-30 12:03         ` Wanlong Gao
2011-05-30 12:05           ` Zhang, Shijie
2011-05-30 12:58         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-30  2:07 ` CaT
2011-05-30  6:01   ` Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
2011-05-30  6:43 ` [GIT PULL] small perf fix for v3.0-rc1 Ingo Molnar
2011-05-30 13:38 ` Camille Moncelier [this message]
2011-05-30 14:07 ` Linux 3.0-rc1 15Hz
2011-05-30 14:33   ` trapDoor
2011-05-30 20:33 ` Mustapha Rabiu
2011-05-30 20:50   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-31  5:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-05-31 10:34   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-05-31  6:01 ` Dave Airlie
2011-05-31  9:23 ` Willy Tarreau
2011-05-30  9:28 Sedat Dilek
2011-05-31 19:27 ` Sedat Dilek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110530153826.456c63f8@rasalhague \
    --to=camille@moncelier.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.