From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756889Ab1FFMtT (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:49:19 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:55650 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754559Ab1FFMtP (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:49:15 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:48:51 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: pageexec@freemail.hu Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andy Lutomirski , x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jesper Juhl , Borislav Petkov , Andrew Morton , Arjan van de Ven , Jan Beulich , richard -rw- weinberger , Mikael Pettersson , Andi Kleen , Brian Gerst , Louis Rilling , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64, vsyscalls: Rename UNSAFE_VSYSCALLS to COMPAT_VSYSCALLS Message-ID: <20110606124851.GA29865@elte.hu> References: <20110606102419.GA837@elte.hu> <4DECB7E8.5549.12290923@pageexec.freemail.hu> <20110606124743.GB22375@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110606124743.GB22375@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Ingo Molnar wrote: > > [...] does that mean that you guys would accept a patch that > > would map the vdso at a fixed address for old times's sake? if > > not, on what grounds would you refuse it? see, you can't have it > > both ways. > > You can actually do that by enabling CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO=y. (on 32-bit x86) Thanks, Ingo