From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bob.dunlop@xyzzy.org.uk (Bob Dunlop) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:41:45 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] davinci: dm6467/T EVM: pass reference clock rate to dm646x_init() In-Reply-To: References: <1307034677-27236-1-git-send-email-nsekhar@ti.com> <1307034677-27236-2-git-send-email-nsekhar@ti.com> <4DEB7DD4.5050706@mvista.com> <20110606122552.GA2729@xyzzy.org.uk> Message-ID: <20110607074145.GA6593@xyzzy.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jun 06 at 06:32, Nori, Sekhar wrote: ... > > Add the ref_clk_rate parameter to the davinci_soc_info structure and > > perform the clock adjustment in davinci_common_init(). The code assumes > > Lets not extend davinci_soc_info any further. We need to be looking > at ways of reducing its usage (for example by making GPIO code use > platform device). > > Also, refclk is a board information not soc information so placing > it there makes it misplaced. Okay let's drop this idea. I must admit I was concerned about opening up the structure availability. -- Bob Dunlop