From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752790Ab1FGKFp (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2011 06:05:45 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:40421 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752178Ab1FGKFo (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2011 06:05:44 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 12:05:19 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: pageexec@freemail.hu Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andy Lutomirski , x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jesper Juhl , Borislav Petkov , Andrew Morton , Arjan van de Ven , Jan Beulich , richard -rw- weinberger , Mikael Pettersson , Andi Kleen , Brian Gerst , Louis Rilling , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64, vsyscalls: Rename UNSAFE_VSYSCALLS to COMPAT_VSYSCALLS Message-ID: <20110607100519.GF4133@elte.hu> References: <4DED16C1.24309.139B86C7@pageexec.freemail.hu> <20110606191218.GB20123@elte.hu> <4DED6AAC.12348.14E3578E@pageexec.freemail.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DED6AAC.12348.14E3578E@pageexec.freemail.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * pageexec@freemail.hu wrote: > you called this feature "borderline security FUD" but have yet to > prove it. No, i did not claim that this feature is "borderline security FUD", at all. I said, and i quote my original reply to Linus: | | > Do you have *any* reason to call this "unsafe"? | | No, there's no reason at all for that. That naming is borderline | security FUD and last time i saw the series i considered renaming | it but got distracted :-) | https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/6/141 That the *NAMING* is borderline security FUD. (I already applied the patches before i wrote that mail, see the commit notifications on lkml.) Either you have basic reading comprehension problems or you are lying deliberately, putting words into my mouth that i never said. Which one is it? Thanks, Ingo