From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752959Ab1FIOwV (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:52:21 -0400 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([74.125.121.67]:58716 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751595Ab1FIOwU (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:52:20 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-operating-system :user-agent; b=av7Ht6Y1V+a7zdkF0BDcD3wqqdsFO3W86SxpBcW8QnTSBFetBy8uYuJ2v9aiBYWfHr v6+u4rGaxSC5CKu+c12Q== Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 07:51:59 -0700 From: Mandeep Singh Baines To: Don Zickus Cc: Mandeep Singh Baines , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marcin Slusarz , Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] watchdog: fix rounding issues in get_sample_period() Message-ID: <20110609145159.GG17986@google.com> References: <1305588901-8141-1-git-send-email-msb@chromium.org> <20110518135302.GM29881@redhat.com> <20110519162631.GJ11023@google.com> <20110609114745.GQ8162@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110609114745.GQ8162@redhat.com> X-Operating-System: Linux/2.6.32-gg426-generic (x86_64) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-System-Of-Record: true Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Don Zickus (dzickus@redhat.com) wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 09:26:31AM -0700, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote: > > Don Zickus (dzickus@redhat.com) wrote: > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 04:34:58PM -0700, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote: > > > > In get_sample_period(), softlockup_thresh is integer divided by 5 before > > > > the multiplication by NSEC_PER_SEC. This results in softlockup_thresh > > > > being rounded down to the nearest integer multiple of 5. > > > > > > > > For example, a softlockup_thresh of 4 rounds down to 0. > > > > > > Mandeep, > > > > > > Thanks for the patches. Unfortunately, I am taking some time off so I'll > > > shephard these patches when I get back. For the most part they look fine, > > > aside from Ingo's comments. > > > > > > > No problem. Enjoy your time off:) > > > > Ingo, since Don is out, would you mind acking the patches (assuming you're > > happy). It simplifies pushing these patches into our local ChromiumOS tree > > if I have an upstream ack. > > Hi Mandeep, > > It looks like Ingo took most of your patches. Is there any outstanding > ones that didn't make it that you see? > Hi Don, Thanks for following up. All the patches are now in. I am working on a few new NMI issues so I'll be sending out a few patches in a day or so. I've committed one critical fix to our 2.6.32 tree and am now working on forward-porting it to tip/master: http://git.chromium.org/gitweb/?p=chromiumos/third_party/kernel.git;a=commitdiff;h=2a825f5f38f24e655dd655253eaaa5a82460a43e;hp=09ecdd5b43b9df930efd51a3fe317c18907a6c2d Regards, Mandeep > Cheers, > Don