From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757338Ab1FPI6s (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:58:48 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:54615 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753357Ab1FPI6r (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:58:47 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=W1+TySKHysZJ1b8qFtSXk+FNeT6owG5U5+ndJy8RTf1Psk94OW5i8uZN+ydngIve0z LIkEL8EzK1Z8vSUn5qf2M5MiZ5aR08sXsiNvAz9KC1vkOdzRrsF2Zgb9y4iPnyrj2MVm i+PMdFF9od4967biZgtg/k+ikzuxySDY4/fy0= Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:58:42 +0400 From: Vasiliy Kulikov To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, Andrew Morton , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5 v4] procfs: introduce hidepid=, hidenet=, gid= mount options Message-ID: <20110616085842.GB3215@albatros> References: <1308163895-5963-1-git-send-email-segoon@openwall.com> <201106161050.27716.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201106161050.27716.arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnd, On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:50 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The patches all look good to me implementation-wise. Thanks for the review! > I have no opinion on whether it's a good idea to include the feature or not. Why not? Have you some specific complains where it can be perhaps too strong/insufficient/non-configurable? Thanks, -- Vasiliy Kulikov http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Reply-To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Sender: Vasiliy Kulikov Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 12:58:42 +0400 From: Vasiliy Kulikov Message-ID: <20110616085842.GB3215@albatros> References: <1308163895-5963-1-git-send-email-segoon@openwall.com> <201106161050.27716.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201106161050.27716.arnd@arndb.de> Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC 0/5 v4] procfs: introduce hidepid=, hidenet=, gid= mount options To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, Andrew Morton , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "David S. Miller" List-ID: Hi Arnd, On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:50 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The patches all look good to me implementation-wise. Thanks for the review! > I have no opinion on whether it's a good idea to include the feature or not. Why not? Have you some specific complains where it can be perhaps too strong/insufficient/non-configurable? Thanks, -- Vasiliy Kulikov http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments