From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] stash: Add --clean option to stash and remove all untracked files Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:00:15 -0400 Message-ID: <20110622150015.GB9266@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1308612986-26593-1-git-send-email-david@porkrind.org> <20110621003852.GB2050@sigill.intra.peff.net> <4DFFF5AA.4030401@porkrind.org> <4E002762.3050803@sohovfx.com> <4E003A0F.5080601@viscovery.net> <20110621141843.GA18700@sigill.intra.peff.net> <4E00C2BD.6000903@esperanto.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Paul Ebermann , git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Sixt , Andrew Wong , David Caldwell , Junio C Hamano To: Miles Bader X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jun 22 17:00:27 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QZOun-00026v-DZ for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 17:00:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932180Ab1FVPAR (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:00:17 -0400 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([99.108.226.0]:44301 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755582Ab1FVPAR (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:00:17 -0400 Received: (qmail 13792 invoked by uid 107); 22 Jun 2011 15:00:30 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:00:30 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:00:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:47:03PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > Paul Ebermann writes: > >> $ git stash --untracked-too --ignored-too > >> > >> is fairly clear, but somehow strikes me as unnecessarily ugly and > >> verbose. > > > > I think `--also-untracked` sounds better. It is even longer, though. > > "--include-untracked" sounds a bit smoother to my ears. Me too. It's long, but it fits with other git commands. -Peff