From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/8] ARM: DMA-mapping framework redesign Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:18:07 +0200 Message-ID: <20110624091807.GC29299@8bytes.org> References: <1308556213-24970-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from 8bytes.org ([88.198.83.132]:36327 "EHLO 8bytes.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751563Ab1FXJSI (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:18:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1308556213-24970-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Marek Szyprowski Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Kyungmin Park , Arnd Bergmann , Russell King - ARM Linux Hi Marek, On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 09:50:05AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > This patch series is a continuation of my works on implementing generic > IOMMU support in DMA mapping framework for ARM architecture. Now I > focused on the DMA mapping framework itself. It turned out that adding > support for common dma_map_ops structure was not that hard as I initally > thought. After some modification most of the code fits really well to > the generic dma_map_ops methods. I appreciate your progress on this generic dma_ops implementation. But for now it looks very ARM specific. Do you have plans to extend it to non-ARM iommu-api implementations too? Joerg From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail137.messagelabs.com (mail137.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DCC2900225 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 05:18:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:18:07 +0200 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/8] ARM: DMA-mapping framework redesign Message-ID: <20110624091807.GC29299@8bytes.org> References: <1308556213-24970-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1308556213-24970-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Marek Szyprowski Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Kyungmin Park , Arnd Bergmann , Russell King - ARM Linux Hi Marek, On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 09:50:05AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > This patch series is a continuation of my works on implementing generic > IOMMU support in DMA mapping framework for ARM architecture. Now I > focused on the DMA mapping framework itself. It turned out that adding > support for common dma_map_ops structure was not that hard as I initally > thought. After some modification most of the code fits really well to > the generic dma_map_ops methods. I appreciate your progress on this generic dma_ops implementation. But for now it looks very ARM specific. Do you have plans to extend it to non-ARM iommu-api implementations too? Joerg -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: joro@8bytes.org (Joerg Roedel) Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:18:07 +0200 Subject: [PATCH/RFC 0/8] ARM: DMA-mapping framework redesign In-Reply-To: <1308556213-24970-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> References: <1308556213-24970-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Message-ID: <20110624091807.GC29299@8bytes.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Marek, On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 09:50:05AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > This patch series is a continuation of my works on implementing generic > IOMMU support in DMA mapping framework for ARM architecture. Now I > focused on the DMA mapping framework itself. It turned out that adding > support for common dma_map_ops structure was not that hard as I initally > thought. After some modification most of the code fits really well to > the generic dma_map_ops methods. I appreciate your progress on this generic dma_ops implementation. But for now it looks very ARM specific. Do you have plans to extend it to non-ARM iommu-api implementations too? Joerg