From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:55:35 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot] SPL framework re-design
In-Reply-To: <20110627205046.BF6FB177DBA4@gemini.denx.de>
References: <4DF9B9E0.8020206@ti.com>
	<20110616104716.762DD19E5AC3@gemini.denx.de>
	<BANLkTim9AE2aszKLiDH53vd+Hjpz7GVoNA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DFA00B8.7000807@gmail.com>
	<loom.20110627T010402-587@post.gmane.org>
	<20110627092731.3532D202C61@gemini.denx.de>
	<20110627133435.31cd3271@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net>
	<20110627205046.BF6FB177DBA4@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <20110627155535.4217b15b@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:50:46 +0200
Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> wrote:

> Dear Scott Wood,
> 
> In message <20110627133435.31cd3271@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> you wrote:
> >
> > > Good point.  Eventually we can  just add additional build rules for
> > > new object files (say, ".splo" instead of ".o") ?
> > 
> > No need for new extensions -- we should be able to use the target
> > directory to influence rule selection.
> 
> But if we do not create a new hierarchy of target directories we will
> have the "normal" and the "spl" objects in parallel (and I don't want
> to delete one when building the other).

What's wrong with creating a new hierarchy of target directories?  It
would be like specifying a different output directory.

-Scott