From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:18:03 -0500
Subject: [U-Boot] SPL framework re-design
In-Reply-To: <20110627211033.783351A23C39@gemini.denx.de>
References: <4DF9B9E0.8020206@ti.com>
	<20110616104716.762DD19E5AC3@gemini.denx.de>
	<BANLkTim9AE2aszKLiDH53vd+Hjpz7GVoNA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DFA00B8.7000807@gmail.com>
	<loom.20110627T010402-587@post.gmane.org>
	<20110627092731.3532D202C61@gemini.denx.de>
	<20110627133435.31cd3271@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net>
	<20110627205046.BF6FB177DBA4@gemini.denx.de>
	<20110627155535.4217b15b@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net>
	<20110627211033.783351A23C39@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <20110627161803.16783c48@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 23:10:33 +0200
Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> wrote:

> Dear Scott Wood,
> 
> In message <20110627155535.4217b15b@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> you wrote:
> >
> > > But if we do not create a new hierarchy of target directories we will
> > > have the "normal" and the "spl" objects in parallel (and I don't want
> > > to delete one when building the other).
> > 
> > What's wrong with creating a new hierarchy of target directories?  It
> > would be like specifying a different output directory.
> 
> The question came up what we need it for.

Just seems cleaner to me than jamming it into the file extension.  If we're
treating it as a separate build, it should go into a separate place.  It's
not really a different type of file.

-Scott