From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfgang Denk Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 23:22:00 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot] SPL framework re-design In-Reply-To: <20110627161803.16783c48@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> References: <4DF9B9E0.8020206@ti.com> <20110616104716.762DD19E5AC3@gemini.denx.de> <4DFA00B8.7000807@gmail.com> <20110627092731.3532D202C61@gemini.denx.de> <20110627133435.31cd3271@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> <20110627205046.BF6FB177DBA4@gemini.denx.de> <20110627155535.4217b15b@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> <20110627211033.783351A23C39@gemini.denx.de> <20110627161803.16783c48@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> Message-ID: <20110627212200.76E8316A1C77@gemini.denx.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Dear Scott Wood, In message <20110627161803.16783c48@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> you wrote: > > > > > But if we do not create a new hierarchy of target directories we will > > > > have the "normal" and the "spl" objects in parallel (and I don't want > > > > to delete one when building the other). > > > > > > What's wrong with creating a new hierarchy of target directories? It > > > would be like specifying a different output directory. > > > > The question came up what we need it for. > > Just seems cleaner to me than jamming it into the file extension. If we're > treating it as a separate build, it should go into a separate place. It's > not really a different type of file. I'm fine with that as well. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de A modem is a baudy house.