From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751650Ab1GERwe (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jul 2011 13:52:34 -0400 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:56552 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751168Ab1GERwc (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jul 2011 13:52:32 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 18:52:24 +0100 From: Matthew Garrett To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Am=E9rico?= Wang Cc: Marc Koschewski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER to be removed in 2.6.39 Message-ID: <20110705175224.GB30531@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20110630213728.GA30291@marc.osknowledge.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@cavan.codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cavan.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 08:55:23AM +0800, Américo Wang wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:37 AM, Marc Koschewski wrote: > > Hey guys, > > > > CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER is still there. Missed it or did you want it > > to reside? > > There was a patch to remove it, > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/654021/ > > Don't know why it is not merged. There's still plenty of userspace using it. There probably ought to at least be a period where using it generates a deprecation warning. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org