Unnecessary cache-line flush on page table updates ?

[catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)]

On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 04:55:25PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 04:52:14PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 10:46:52AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > I've since added the dsb+isbs back to the TLB ops because the ARM ARM
> > > is qutie explicit that both are required to ensure that explicit
> > > accesses see the effect of the TLB operation.  To me it is rather
> > > perverse that an ISB is required to ensure that this sequence works:
> > > 
> > > 	write page table entry
> > > 	clean
> > > 	dsb
> > > 	flush tlb entry
> > > 	dsb
> > > 	isb
> > > 	read/write new page
> > 
> > The same requirement can be found in latest (internal only) ARM ARM as
> > well. I think the reason is that some memory access already in the
> > pipeline (but after the TLB flush) may have sampled the state of the
> > page table using an old TLB entry, even though the actual memory access
> > will happen after the DSB.
> 
> It would be useful to have a statement from RG on this.  Could you
> pass this to him please?

Just checked - it is required as per the ARM ARM and there are cores
that rely on the ISB. As I said, it depends on the pipeline
implementation.

-- 
Catalin