From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751615Ab1GGEPQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2011 00:15:16 -0400 Received: from qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.27.212]:33969 "EHLO qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750786Ab1GGEPL (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2011 00:15:11 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 21:14:32 -0700 From: matt mooney To: Matt Chen Cc: N?meth M?rton , David Chang , Greg KH , Matthew Wilcox , Max Vozeler , Joe Perches , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, usbip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] USBIP protocol documentation Message-ID: <20110707041432.GA62825@haskell.muteddisk.com> Mail-Followup-To: Matt Chen , N?meth M?rton , David Chang , Greg KH , Matthew Wilcox , Max Vozeler , Joe Perches , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, usbip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, LKML References: <20110524183448.GA18511@kroah.com> <4DDC142E.6070003@freemail.hu> <20110525031222.GB14290@haskell.muteddisk.com> <4DDC93D5.9070607@freemail.hu> <4DDDFDA7.6030900@freemail.hu> <4E097A32.1000504@freemail.hu> <4E1151BD.5010907@freemail.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 16:24 Mon 04 Jul , Matt Chen wrote: > Hi N?meth, > > 2011/7/4 N?meth M?rton : > > Hi David, Matt Chen and Matt Mooney, > > > > it looks like we four are actively dealing with the USBIP protocol documentation. > > > > David, are you working at the same place like Matt Chen? Then you can easily > > see what you two has been done and not working parallel on the same thing. > Actually, David and me (Matt Chen) are working on 2 different part. > 1. Matt Chen : Server side > 2. David Chang : Client side. > Just didn't figure you submitted the protocol document earlier than we do. > We also write a wiki for our code reviewing, protocol, but since all > we are working personally, something we don't sync, that's why I tried > to ask if which part you are not working on or finished, we can work > on it. Hey guys, It seems like you guys all have a handle on this, so I will defer. When the documentation is at a point where it can be submitted, I will send in grammar patches along with possible reorganization suggestions. Is this a public wiki Matt so that you can post a link to it? Thanks, mfm > Since you submitted the document, it turned out we follow the format > you've done and do some fix for it. > > I'm currently not actively modifying the USBIP protocol description. > > > > Matt Mooney wanted to restructure the USBIP protocol documentation. Matt, do > > you have anything already done? If yes, maybe it would be good if you could > > send it so David can do the changes on your version. If you haven't worked on > > it then please tell and David can add the necessary modifications he suggested. > I supposed it is Matt Mooney. ~ :) > > Regards, > > > > ? ? ? ?M?rton N?meth > > > > David Chang wrote: > >> Hi N?meth, > >> > >> 2011/6/29 David Chang : > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Thanks for your great effort. > >>> Just a little comment on UNLINK pdu size. > > [...] > >> Would you add this field into your path or should I send another patch > >> to add it? > > > > > > > > -- > Thanks ~ > Matt Chen >